Salmon pink, gold foil, script fonts, and those soft, Canva-inspired arches—sound familiar? It’s the signature look of countless brands launched by female entrepreneurs.
In a time when the discourse around femininity and masculinity dominates not just personal identities but commercial landscapes as well, this aesthetic has become almost ubiquitous—and for valid reasons!

In recent years, female-led brands have emerged as dynamic forces of innovation, reshaping industries with fresh perspectives and creative leadership. Yet, many of these ventures inadvertently stumble into a common branding misstep: the over-reliance on hyper-feminine aesthetics.

While often intended to celebrate their position in the marketplace, this approach can confine a brand to limiting stereotypes, curbing its potential to resonate with a broader, more diverse audience.

In the broader market, hyperfeminisation can box female entrepreneurs into restrictive, gendered categories, making it more challenging for them to compete in traditionally male-dominated sectors or secure investment. Investors may perceive hyperfeminised brands as niche rather than scalable or universally appealing, limiting their opportunities for growth and success.

Want to see what this looks like? Type “feminine brands” into Google and hit the images tab. What floods your screen? A dizzying array of pink, purple, blue pastel hues, curly and cursive fonts that scream cutesy, peppered with girl-next-door imagery. Roses, gold paperclips, acrylic nail photos—oh, and I even spotted a “live, laugh, love” sign. Is this nauseating collection of images really the message we’re broadcasting to the world as our definition of femininity?

With gender fluidity on the rise, traditional feminised stereotypes are not only outdated but risk alienating those who reject traditional gender norms. Clinging to these conventions can push brands into spaces where they simply aren’t favoured by more inclusive, diverse audiences—or at the very least, by female consumers who don’t identify with this outdated notion of the ‘submissive girlie’.

FEMALE FOUNDERS MIGHT FEEL COMPELLED TO VISUALLY “SOFTEN” THEIR BUSINESS TO APPEAR APPROACHABLE, THEREBY LEANING ON HYPERFEMINISED AESTHETICS EVEN WHEN THEIR PRODUCT OR SERVICE DOESN’T REQUIRE IT.

 

So how do brands fall into the hyperfeminisation trap?

THE PRESSURE TO MARKET FEMININITY

Female entrepreneurs continually face subtle pressures to “market femininity” due to long-standing gender stereotypes in consumer expectations and branding. The prevalence of hyperfeminised aesthetics in successful female-led brands, along with sociological norms around femininity in business, reinforces this tendency.

THE PINK TAX AND GENDER-BASED PRICING

The “pink tax” has been discussed for several decades, but it gained significant attention in the early 2010s. The most notable study highlighting the pink tax was conducted by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs in 2015, which compared prices of nearly 800 products and found that women’s products were priced higher than similar items for men. While the phenomenon had been observed prior to this study, the 2015 report brought the issue into mainstream conversation and fuelled discussions on gender-based pricing disparities in various sectors.

THE INFLUENCE OF EMOTIONAL LABOUR ON BRAND IDENTITY

Sociologist Arlie Hochschild, in her work on emotional labour, discusses how women are often expected to manage their femininity in professional contexts—balancing competence with likability, empathy, or nurturing qualities. This pressure spills over into brand identities, where female founders might feel compelled to visually “soften” their business to appear approachable, thereby leaning on hyperfeminised aesthetics even when their product or service doesn’t require it.

MEDIA’S ROLE IN SHAPING BRANDING STANDARDS

The lack of diverse examples in mainstream media intensifies the branding pressure on female entrepreneurs, particularly in industries like beauty, where hyperfeminised aesthetics have set cultural standards. Iconic brands like Glossier, with their pastel pop tones and soft imagery, have become the default for what female-led ventures should look like. This limited representation leaves many new entrepreneurs feeling compelled to replicate these models, fearing that diverging from this mould could compromise their credibility or market appeal. Many founders conform to these narrow stereotypes, limiting their brand’s potential and missing the opportunity to redefine the narrative for female-led businesses.

The paradox of hyperfeminisation is that, while it seeks to champion femininity, it often ends up entrenching the same stereotypes it aims to dismantle. By recycling these limiting conventions, brands inadvertently perpetuate outdated gender norms, curbing their potential to inspire real change. In aiming to empower, they risk confining themselves within the very boundaries they seek to transcend.

But this is not solely the responsibility of the founder or entrepreneur; founders rely on designers and studios to shape their brand identity. But the reality is, that many designers fall short of the sophisticated design knowledge and strategic commercial insight needed to move beyond clichéd feminine aesthetics, often defaulting to predictable and limiting tropes.

Clout Wars
Delivered to Your Inbox

The real issue is that design studios bypass critical psychographic and market research through their basic creative briefing, favouring visually appealing yet shallow design concepts as a result. Without a deep understanding of the audience’s motivations, their work lacks the strategic alignment needed to help a brand truly resonate and connect. This is why we created The Brand Review—the world’s first diagnostic consultation that uncovers deep psychographic insights and a brand’s unique arousal touchpoints.

Identifying these touchpoints is crucial for aligning a brand with its core DNA, regardless of its target demographic. A brand’s emotional triggers—whether they evoke strength, ambition, or authority—can often lean more masculine, even when directed at a solely female audience. Leveraging these touchpoints ensures the brand resonates authentically, steering clear of superficial, gendered aesthetics.

Female founders love to talk about disruption, almost framing it as a revolution. Many adopt the persona of Joan of Arc, wielding femininity as their weapon in the battle against the patriarchy—an absolutely nonsensical notion that had its heyday and is now long gone.

It truly is time to break free from the cacophony of traditional gender constraints in branding. True success lies in unearthing and crafting an identity that reflects their unique, often peculiar, values, vision, and the authentic essence of their offering—not conforming to outdated norms for the sake of safety.

Design like any worthwhile endeavour requires risk, but this can be mitigated through data, market research, and proven psychological insights that guide every nuanced design decision. Only then can a brand identity create deeper emotional connections, cutting through the superficiality of a market saturated with feminine banality.

Share