Startup culture has a problem, and it’s wearing a black turtleneck. Let’s step into a dimension most founders don’t dare look at too closely, because it forces us to ask uncomfortable questions. What happens when clout becomes currency? What happens when founders believe the performance matters more than the product? And what happens when sociopathy becomes strategy?

This isn’t about schadenfreude. It’s not about taking down fallen figures. This is about pattern recognition and power literacy. Because if you’re building anything right now, especially something disruptive, high-stakes, or visible, what we unpack here could save your credibility… and your company.

Let’s start with the cover.

THREE FACES. THREE VERY DIFFERENT DOMAINS. THREE EERILY SIMILAR STORIES.

Charlie Javice, founder of Frank, a fintech platform supposedly designed to democratise the broken student loan system. Her pitch? Make FAFSA simple. Help students. Fix bureaucracy. The dream? Noble. The deck? Sharp. The backers? JPMorgan, which acquired Frank for $175 million. But in 2023, she was charged with fabricating four million fake users to inflate the valuation. She even hired a data scientist to create this phantom user base. Her commercial superpower wasn’t tech, it was audacity.

Then there’s Billy McFarland, the man behind Fyre Festival. What started as a sleek luxury music event ended in FEMA tents and cheese sandwiches. McFarland had already been running shaky ventures before Fyre. The warning signs were there. He simply knew how to spin them into a founder’s hustle. Even after prison, he tried again—promising Fyre Festival 2, claiming it would be held in Mexico. Local tourism officials publicly denied any record of it. Tickets were sold. Hype reignited. But behind the scenes? Nothing existed.

Elizabeth Holmes, the high priestess of bio-disruption, promised a medical revolution. Her company, Theranos, would run 200 blood tests from a single drop. The ambition? Billion-dollar. The PR machine? Flawless. She graced Forbes, Time, Fortune, TED stages. But the tech didn’t work. Not even close. Not ever. Stanford professor Phyllis Gardner told her the science was impossible. Whistleblowers inside Theranos flagged dangerous discrepancies. Holmes ignored them all and pushed forward, raising hundreds of millions on medical fiction. She is now serving time. 11 years to be precise.

These weren’t flukes. These were intentional acts of deception, wrapped in startup glitter. Driven not just by ambition, but by something darker: a compulsive need to win at all costs, to be seen as a visionary, even if the product was smoke and mirrors.

In clinical terms, these behaviours often map onto narcissistic or sociopathic traits: grandiosity, lack of empathy, pathological lying, and a total detachment from consequence. Tech culture often rewards those exact traits, so long as they’re cloaked in disruption and charisma.

This isn’t just a personality issue. It’s a systemic blind spot—where performance is prioritized over principles, and founders are allowed—encouraged—to fake it until they make it.

Let’s zoom out. Different sectors. Same psychology. So what’s the real pattern?

THE CULT OF PERSONALITY AND IDENTITY

Each of these individuals became larger than their product. Their identities were the startup. Their stories were the pitch deck. When identity fuses with business, ego overrides ethics. Vision turns into vanity. Charisma masks chaos.

I’ve seen this play out too many times. In 20 years in branding and reputation, I’ve worked with Fortune 500s, elite athletes, VC-backed founders, politicians, and high-performance personalities. I developed a policy that most people don’t talk about publicly, but I will: not everyone deserves a platform. Not everyone is fit for the spotlight.

I learned the hard way. A client came to us with charm, grandiosity, and mystery; hungry for press, stage, and spotlight. But as we prepped for visibility, his story unravelled: mismatched dates, contradictions, shadowy gaps. Then came the leaks, lawsuits, unpaid debts, and federal-level lies. The truth caught up, and his empire collapsed. Since then, we’ve enforced one of the strictest vetting systems in the media industry. Every high-stakes client undergoes psychometric and personality screening—not out of judgment, but to ensure we’re building empires rooted in ethics, not ego.

Due diligence isn’t just about product-market fit. It’s about character-market safety. If your identity collapses when challenged, you’re not ready for the weight of leadership. You want a global platform? Clean up your personal architecture first. Because if you don’t, the internet will. 

DUE DILIGENCE ISN’T JUST ABOUT PRODUCT-MARKET FIT. IT’S ABOUT CHARACTER-MARKET SAFETY.

Let’s be blunt. The same traits that investors reward—confidence, relentlessness, risk-taking—can easily blur into narcissism, deception, and manipulation. It’s not just a startup problem. It’s a political pattern, too. The performative confidence. The crafted persona. The rewriting of reality in real time. Entire nations have followed figures like this, believing the myth over the man.

Here’s what you’ll often see:

  • Grandiosity: They believe the rules don’t apply to them.
  • Pathological lying: They justify it as storytelling.
  • Lack of empathy: They don’t see stakeholders, just stepping stones.
  • Addiction to admiration: they need the spotlight more than they need the solution to work.

These aren’t buzzwords. They’re clinical traits of antisocial behaviour. And they’re showing up in boardrooms wearing black turtlenecks and pitching Series B rounds.

Get the right investor tweet, land a magazine cover, speak at a summit, and suddenly you’ve got momentum. But when perception becomes the product, truth becomes optional. And that’s where everything begins to disintegrate.

We’ve created a startup economy that celebrates the illusion. Where pitch decks are cinematic trailers. Founder bios read like Oscar scripts. “Stealth mode” is used to mask non-performance. Clout is the currency—until the receipts hit the table.

Founders, this is your wake-up call. It is not enough to have a vision. It is not enough to be followed by VCs on LinkedIn. Your character is your currency. Your integrity is your insurance.

Clout Wars
Delivered to Your Inbox

You want to build a global empire? Start with a moral operating system.

Here’s where to begin:

  • Due diligence on yourself. What are your blind spots? What truth are you bending to soothe your ego?
  • Due diligence on your team. Are you surrounded by sycophants or straight-shooters? If your boardroom feels like a fan club, you’re already in trouble.
  • Transparency in failure. Real founders don’t hide their setbacks. They document them. Investors can handle pivots. They won’t tolerate gaslighting.
  • Audit your ambition. Are you building for impact, or are you chasing applause?

Because in this climate, founders aren’t just building companies. They’re being watched. By regulators. By the public. By AI. Your digital footprint is your legacy.

Let’s finish with Newton’s Third Law: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Lie on your pitch deck? It will catch up to you. Overpromise to your investors? There will be a reckoning. Use charm to cover up incompetence? There will be a collapse.

Flip it: act with integrity. Deliver on your product. Treat people with respect even when no one is watching… and the reaction is force. Momentum. Trust. Longevity.

That’s the empire worth building. That’s the kind of founder the next era demands. Not loud. Not reckless. But grounded in truth, ruthless in execution, and sovereign in ethics.

The age of empty clout is over. Build something that can’t be cancelled.

Share